Anthropic’s mission is to create reliable, interpretable, and steerable AI systems. We want AI to be safe and beneficial for our users and for society as a whole. Our team is a quickly growing group of committed researchers, engineers, policy experts, and business leaders working together to build beneficial AI systems.
How do we know whether a model is safe - and how do we know whether the systems we built to catch misuse actually catch it?
Anthropic answers both questions with evaluations. We measure model behavior across misuse, prompt injection, and user well-being to inform training and deployment decisions. We also use AI to investigate potential misuse of Claude, analyzing real-world traffic to surface bad actors and emerging threats that drive enforcement actions. Neither is worth much unless the evaluations behind them are representative, robust, and trustworthy.
This role builds the methods and infrastructure that make them so. Sitting at the intersection of applied ML research and engineering, you'll design experiments to improve how we evaluate both model behavior and the agentic systems that govern it, build datasets that represent real abuse rather than clean approximations of it, and ship those methods into the pipelines that gate model training, agent changes, and launch decisions.
Evaluation research and methodology. Design and run experiments to improve evaluation quality — developing methods to generate representative test data, simulate realistic user behavior, and validate grading accuracy. Research how different factors (multi-turn conversations, tools, long context, user diversity) impact model safety behavior. Analyze evaluation coverage to identify measurement gaps, and evolve evals so they remain unsaturated and high-signal as model and agent capabilities advance.
Agentic investigation evals. Build and own the evaluation harness for an agentic investigation system — defining metrics, test cases, and grading approaches for a complex, long-horizon agent. Measure agent performance end-to-end (detection precision and recall, investigation quality, robustness) and drive hill-climbing on the hardest harm areas. Construct RL environments to improve Claude's safety investigation capabilities.
Datasets grounded in real harm. Construct high-quality eval datasets representing real-world misuse across harm areas such as cyber attacks, bio weapons, and influence operations, drawing from both real traffic patterns and synthetic generation. Collaborate with Policy and Enforcement to translate observed harm patterns into measurable evaluations.
Productionization and tooling. Ship successful research into evaluation, regression, and release pipelines that run during model training, on every agent change, prompt update, and underlying model upgrade, and beyond launch. Build tooling that enables policy experts to author, run, and iterate on evaluations without engineering support. Surface findings to research and training teams to drive upstream model improvements.
The annual compensation range for this role is listed below.
For sales roles, the range provided is the role’s On Target Earnings ("OTE") range, meaning that the range includes both the sales commissions/sales bonuses target and annual base salary for the role.
Minimum education: Bachelor’s degree or an equivalent combination of education, training, and/or experience
Required field of study: A field relevant to the role as demonstrated through coursework, training, or professional experience
Minimum years of experience: Years of experience required will correlate with the internal job level requirements for the position
Location-based hybrid policy: Currently, we expect all staff to be in one of our offices at least 25% of the time. However, some roles may require more time in our offices.
Visa sponsorship: We do sponsor visas! However, we aren't able to successfully sponsor visas for every role and every candidate. But if we make you an offer, we will make every reasonable effort to get you a visa, and we retain an immigration lawyer to help with this.
We encourage you to apply even if you do not believe you meet every single qualification. Not all strong candidates will meet every single qualification as listed. Research shows that people who identify as being from underrepresented groups are more prone to experiencing imposter syndrome and doubting the strength of their candidacy, so we urge you not to exclude yourself prematurely and to submit an application if you're interested in this work. We think AI systems like the ones we're building have enormous social and ethical implications. We think this makes representation even more important, and we strive to include a range of diverse perspectives on our team.
Your safety matters to us. To protect yourself from potential scams, remember that Anthropic recruiters only contact you from @anthropic.com email addresses. In some cases, we may partner with vetted recruiting agencies who will identify themselves as working on behalf of Anthropic. Be cautious of emails from other domains. Legitimate Anthropic recruiters will never ask for money, fees, or banking information before your first day. If you're ever unsure about a communication, don't click any links—visit anthropic.com/careers directly for confirmed position openings.
We believe that the highest-impact AI research will be big science. At Anthropic we work as a single cohesive team on just a few large-scale research efforts. And we value impact — advancing our long-term goals of steerable, trustworthy AI — rather than work on smaller and more specific puzzles. We view AI research as an empirical science, which has as much in common with physics and biology as with traditional efforts in computer science. We're an extremely collaborative group, and we host frequent research discussions to ensure that we are pursuing the highest-impact work at any given time. As such, we greatly value communication skills.
The easiest way to understand our research directions is to read our recent research. This research continues many of the directions our team worked on prior to Anthropic, including: GPT-3, Circuit-Based Interpretability, Multimodal Neurons, Scaling Laws, AI & Compute, Concrete Problems in AI Safety, and Learning from Human Preferences.
Anthropic is a public benefit corporation headquartered in San Francisco. We offer competitive compensation and benefits, optional equity donation matching, generous vacation and parental leave, flexible working hours, and a lovely office space in which to collaborate with colleagues. Guidance on Candidates' AI Usage: Learn about our policy for using AI in our application process.
Will AI replace this role?
Check AI displacement risk, transferable skills, and career alternatives for Staff+ Software Engineer, Safeguards Evals
The salary range for the Staff+ Software Engineer, Safeguards Evals position at Anthropic is USD 320k+/yr.
The Staff+ Software Engineer, Safeguards Evals position at Anthropic is based in San Francisco, CA; New York City, NY; New York, New York, United States; San Francisco, California, United States; Seattle, Washington, United States. This is a hybrid position.
The Staff+ Software Engineer, Safeguards Evals position at Anthropic is a Internship role.
The Staff+ Software Engineer, Safeguards Evals position at Anthropic requires 8+ yrs exp.
Key skills for the Staff+ Software Engineer, Safeguards Evals position at Anthropic include: large language models.
